Citation: | DAI Yuting, WANG Qing, ZHANG Min, SHI Huiling, JI Kangling. Exercise rehabilitation preferences in stroke patients: a concept analysis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(8): 113-118. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233855 |
To analyze and explicate the conceptual connotations of exercise rehabilitation preferences in stroke patients.
A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL, with the search period extending from inception to October 2022. In accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible literatures were selected, and a comprehensive analysis was performed by Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis method.
A total of 34 literatures were included. Exercise rehabilitation preferences for stroke patients encompassed 5 concept attributes: preferences for exercise rehabilitation programs, risk tolerance in rehabilitation, time preferences for engaging in exercises, supervision and support, and confidence and challenges; the antecedents to these preferences included demographic factors, disease-related factors, emotional and psychological factors, external environmental factors, and fatigue; outcomes associated with these preferences included the realization of individualized exercise rehabilitation, improvement in adherence to rehabilitation regimens, increased levels of physical activity, and facilitation of motor function recovery.
Through the conceptual analysis of exercise rehabilitation preferences in stroke patients, healthcare professionals can better understand its underlying dimensions, thereby enabling more in-depth research and exploration into exercise rehabilitation practices tailored for stroke patients.
[1] |
EINSTAD M S, SALTVEDT I, LYDERSEN S, et al. Associations between post-stroke motor and cognitive function: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21(1): 103. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02055-7
|
[2] |
SELVES C, STOQUART G, LEJEUNE T. Gait rehabilitation after stroke: review of the evidence of predictors, clinical outcomes and timing for interventions[J]. Acta Neurol Belg, 2020, 120(4): 783-790. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01320-7
|
[3] |
BERNHARDT J, URIMUBENSHI G, GANDHI D B C, et al. Stroke rehabilitation in low-income and middle-income countries: a call to action[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10260): 1452-1462. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31313-1
|
[4] |
REBAR A L, DIMMOCK J A, JACKSON B, et al. A systematic review of the effects of non-conscious regulatory processes in physical activity[J]. Health Psychol Rev, 2016, 10(4): 395-407. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1183505
|
[5] |
吴蕾, 张力, 彭夏培, 等. 首发脑卒中患者积极度现状及影响因素[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(15): 15-17, 68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202015005.htm
|
[6] |
苏闪闪, 郑蔚, 王丹丹, 等. 癌症患者社会疏离的概念分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(9): 1088-1093. doi: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.09.009
|
[7] |
SANDIFER M G Jr, ALBERT R F, WILSON I C. Patient preference: Indoklon vs. electroshock therapy[J]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1962, 134: 184-186. doi: 10.1097/00005053-196202000-00010
|
[8] |
SOLOMON N A, GLICK H A, RUSSO C J, et al. Patient preferences for stroke outcomes[J]. Stroke, 1994, 25(9): 1721-1725. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.25.9.1721
|
[9] |
MCAULEY E, COURNEYA K S, RUDOLPH D L, et al. Enhancing exercise adherence in middle-aged males and females[J]. Prev Med, 1994, 23(4): 498-506. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1068
|
[10] |
WU C Y, WONG M K, LIN K C, et al. Effects of task goal and personal preference on seated reaching kinematics after stroke[J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(1): 70-76. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.32.1.70
|
[11] |
POISSANT L, MAYO N E, WOOD-DAUPHINEE S, et al. The development and preliminary validation of a Preference-Based Stroke Index (PBSI)[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2003, 1: 43. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-43
|
[12] |
LAVER K, RATCLIFFE J, GEORGE S, et al. Early rehabilitation management after stroke: what do stroke patients prefer[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2011, 43(4): 354-358. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0678
|
[13] |
BANKS G, BERNHARDT J, CHURILOV L, et al. Exercise preferences are different after stroke[J]. Stroke Res Treat, 2012, 2012: 890946.
|
[14] |
BONNER N S, O'HALLORAN P D, BERNHARDT J, et al. Developing the stroke exercise preference inventory (SEPI)[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(10): e0164120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164120
|
[15] |
GEIDL W, KNOCKE K, SCHUPP W, et al. Measuring stroke patients' exercise preferences using a discrete choice experiment[J]. Neurol Int, 2018, 10(1): 6993.
|
[16] |
LAVER K, RATCLIFFE J, GEORGE S, et al. Preferences for rehabilitation service delivery: a comparison of the views of patients, occupational therapists and other rehabilitation clinicians using a discrete choice experiment[J]. Aust Occup Ther J, 2013, 60(2): 93-100.
|
[17] |
COMBS S A, VAN PUYMBROECK M, ALTENBURGER P A, et al. Is walking faster or walking farther more important to persons with chronic stroke[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2013, 35(10): 860-867. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.717575
|
[18] |
CAETANO L C G, TEIXEIRA-SALMELA L F, SAMORA G A R, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Exercise Preference Questionnaire(stroke)[J]. Braz J Phys Ther, 2017, 21(5): 336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2016.08.001
|
[19] |
VINCENT-ONABAJO G, MOHAMMED Z. Preferred rehabilitation setting among stroke survivors in Nigeria and associated personal factors[J]. Afr J Disabil, 2018, 7: 352.
|
[20] |
CARLSTEDT E, MÅNSSON LEXELL E, STÅHL A, et al. Stroke survivors' preferences regarding study participation in rehabilitation research[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2022, 22(1): 36. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01521-z
|
[21] |
BLENNERHASSETT J M, COOPER T, LOGAN A, et al. The stroke exercise preference inventory is feasible to use in a community rehabilitation setting[J]. Physiother Theory Pract, 2022, 38(3): 456-463. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1678206
|
[22] |
VADAS D, PREST K, TURK A, et al. Understanding the facilitators and barriers of stroke survivors' adherence to recovery-oriented self-practice: a thematic synthesis[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2022, 44(22): 6608-6619. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1968512
|
[23] |
KHOSHBAKHT PISHKHANI M, DALVANDI A, EBADI A, et al. Factors affecting adherence to rehabilitation in Iranian stroke patients: a qualitative study[J]. J Vasc Nurs, 2019, 37(4): 264-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2019.07.001
|
[24] |
LUKER J, LYNCH E, BERNHARDSSON S, et al. Stroke survivors' experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2015, 96(9): 1698-1708, e10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017
|
[25] |
BURTON C R, FARGHER E, PLUMPTON C, et al. Investigating preferences for support with life after stroke: a discrete choice experiment[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2014, 14: 63. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-63
|
[26] |
APPAU A, LENCUCHA R, FINCH L, et al. Further validation of the Preference-Based Stroke Index three months after stroke[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2019, 33(7): 1214-1220. doi: 10.1177/0269215519834064
|
[27] |
RINEHART J K, SINGLETON R D, ADAIR J C, et al. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference[J]. Stroke, 2009, 40(2): 545-550. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.528497
|
[28] |
KRISHNAN S, PAPPADIS M R, WELLER S C, et al. Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers: a qualitative analysis[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2018, 40(12): 1401-1409. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1297855
|
[29] |
CAETANO L C G, PACHECO B D, SAMORA G A R, et al. Self-efficacy to engage in physical exercise and walking ability best predicted exercise adherence after stroke[J]. Stroke Res Treat, 2020, 2020: 2957623.
|
[30] |
LIN S L, WANG C L, WANG Q M, et al. The experience of stroke survivors and caregivers during hospital-to-home transitional care: a qualitative longitudinal study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2022, 130: 104213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104213
|
[31] |
PRAKASH V, GANESAN M. What matters to patients with stroke in India and why: a qualitative study[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2021, 43(18): 2585-2592. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1706194
|
[32] |
RAFSTEN L, SUNNERHAGEN K S. Patient-centered goal setting in very early supported discharge with continued rehabilitation after stroke[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2023, 45(23): 3869-3874. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2141357
|
[33] |
MAHMOOD A, NAYAK P, ENGLISH C, et al. Adherence to home exercises and rehabilitation (ADHERE) after stroke in low-to-middle-income countries: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2022, 29(6): 438-448.
|
[34] |
PISHKHANI M K, DALVANDI A, EBADI A, et al. Adherence to a rehabilitation regimen in stroke patients: a concept analysis[J]. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, 2020, 25(2): 139-145.
|
[35] |
ARGENT R, DALY A, CAULFIELD B. Patient involvement with home-based exercise programs: can connected health interventions influence adherence?[J]. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2018, 6(3): e47.
|
[36] |
KEVDZIJA M, BOZOVIC-STAMENOVIC R, MARQUARDT G. Stroke patients' free-time activities and spatial preferences during inpatient recovery in rehabilitation centers[J]. HERD, 2022, 15(4): 96-113.
|
[37] |
KO H, KIM H, KIM Y, et al. Dose-response effect of daily rehabilitation time on functional gain in stroke patients[J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2020, 44(2): 101-108.
|
[38] |
万方. 绿色消费偏好形成的理性过程及其对外部性问题的纠正: 基于环境标志制度的分析[J]. 消费经济, 2010, 26(6): 90-93.
|
[39] |
姜树广, 韦倩, 沈梁军. 认知能力、行为偏好与个人金融决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2021, 24(1): 19-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCYJ202101003.htm
|
[40] |
刘世蒙, 杨毅, 孙辉, 等. 患者偏好证据应用于卫生技术评估的价值、方法及挑战[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2022, 15(5): 52-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWZ202205008.htm
|
[41] |
华英杰. 癫痫患者选择抗癫痫药物的偏好研究: 来自离散选择实验的证据[D]. 温州: 温州医科大学, 2021.
|
[42] |
李慧琴. 胃癌患者对术后随访的需求与偏好: 基于离散选择实验分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2021.
|