Citation: | LI Tingting, XUE Jiping, SU Lili. Prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis by shear wave elastography and conventional ultrasound features of breast cancer and model establishment[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(5): 11-15. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221769 |
To explore the predictive value of shear wave elastography (SWE) quantitative parameters and conventional ultrasound features of primary lesions for axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer, and to construct a preoperative nomogram model combined with axillary ultrasound.
A total of 295 breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative SWE and conventional ultrasound were selected. Ultrasonic features of primary lesions and axillary lymph nodes were retrospectively analyzed, and independent risk factors associated with ALNM were screened, based on which a nomogram model was constructed and the predictive value was assessed.
Breast tumor uneven margin, Emax and positive for ALNM by ultrasound diagnosis were independent risk factors for predicting ALNM. On this basis, the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram model was 0.842 (95%CI, 0.786 to 0.888), and the prediction efficiency was significantly better than that of a single index (P < 0.05).
The quantitative parameters of SWE and conventional ultrasound characteristics of primary lesions of breast cancer can be used to predict ALNM, and the nomogram model constructed in combination with axillary ultrasound has a good value in predicting ALNM.
[1] |
SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
|
[2] |
KOLARIK D, PECHA V, SKOVAJSOVA M, et al. Predicting axillary sentinel node status in patients with primary breast cancer[J]. Neoplasma, 2013, 60(3): 334-342. doi: 10.4149/neo_2013_045
|
[3] |
MAESEELE N, FAES J, VAN DE PUTTE T, et al. Axillary lymph node dissection on the Run[J]. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2017, 9(1): 45-49.
|
[4] |
LYMAN G H, GIULIANO A E, SOMERFIELD M R, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(30): 7703-7720. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.001
|
[5] |
孙彦, 雷玉涛, 崔立刚, 等. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结超声造影术前应用的临床研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2020, 36(6): 488-491. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2020.06.003
|
[6] |
MARINO M A, AVENDANO D, ZAPATA P, et al. Lymph node imaging in patients with primary breast cancer: concurrent diagnostic tools[J]. Oncologist, 2020, 25(2): e231-e242. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0427
|
[7] |
JAMARIS S, JAMALUDDIN J, ISLAM T, et al. Is pre-operative axillary ultrasound alone sufficient to determine need for axillary dissection in early breast cancer patients[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(19): e25412. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025412
|
[8] |
AZMIL A, BANSAL G J. Can nomograms predict preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer to guide second look ultrasonography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(6): 1447-1453. doi: 10.1002/jum.14485
|
[9] |
QIU X Y, JIANG Y L, ZHAO Q Y, et al. Could ultrasound-based radiomics noninvasively predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2020, 39(10): 1897-1905. doi: 10.1002/jum.15294
|
[10] |
LUO Y W, ZHAO C Y, GAO Y J, et al. Predicting axillary lymph node status with a nomogram based on breast lesion ultrasound features: performance in N1 breast cancer patients[J]. Front Oncol, 2020, 10: 581321. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.581321
|
[11] |
JIANG T, SU W W, ZHAO Y N, et al. Non-invasive prediction of lymph node status for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer based on a morphological feature from ultrasound images[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2021, 11(8): 3399-3407. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1201
|
[12] |
ZONG Q Q, DENG J, GE W L, et al. Establishment of simple nomograms for predicting axillary lymph node involvement in early breast cancer[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2020, 12: 2025-2035. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S241641
|
[13] |
孙芳, 杨智, 许永波, 等. 超声特征联合免疫组化构建列线图预测早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2022, 38(2): 146-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2022.02.009
|
[14] |
LEE S E, SIM Y, KIM S, et al. Predictive performance of ultrasonography-based radiomics for axillary lymph node metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer[J]. Ultrasonography, 2021, 40(1): 93-102. doi: 10.14366/usg.20026
|
[15] |
时兆婷, 乐坚, 陈雅玲, 等. 浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与腋下淋巴结转移的相关性研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2017, 26(5): 424-429. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.05.012
|
[16] |
GUO Q, DONG Z W, ZHANG L, et al. Ultrasound features of breast cancer for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2018, 37(6): 1354-1353. doi: 10.1002/jum.14469
|
[17] |
卓家伟, 何以敉, 张美恋, 等. 乳腺癌常规超声及剪切波弹性成像表现与淋巴结转移关系的研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2018, 27(8): 709-713. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2018.08.017
|
[18] |
SHENG C R, GAO S S, YAN L M, et al. Application value of conventional ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography in diagnosing triple negative breast cancer[J]. Gland Surg, 2021, 10(6): 1980-1988. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-320
|
[19] |
刘双, 冉素真, 林芸. 剪切波弹性成像在乳腺良恶性病变中的应用进展[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2019, 16(9): 573-576. doi: 10.13929/j.1672-8475.201812025
|
[20] |
LIU T Y, ZHOU L L, LI D N, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts build and secure the tumor microenvironment[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2019, 7: 60. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00060
|
[21] |
邱鹏飞, 刘雁冰, 王永胜, 等. 乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移相关因素与MSKCC列线图的验证性研究[J]. 中华内分泌外科杂志, 2012, 6(5): 307-312. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6090.2012.05.006
|
[22] |
GALIMBERTI V, COLE B F, VIALE G, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(10): 1385-1393. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30380-2
|
1. |
李萍,徐艳芳,胡帅,曾晓霞,胡娟娟,漆学良. 热射病致吉兰-巴雷综合征三例并文献复习. 中国现代神经疾病杂志. 2024(05): 352-358 .
![]() | |
2. |
谢霜霜,谢丹. 体外膈肌起搏器联合神经肌肉电刺激仪在ICU获得性肌无力机械通气患者中的应用. 医疗装备. 2024(24): 26-29+34 .
![]() |