SHAO Xianmao, WU Liangfa, WANG Jingfa, MAO Xiaoman, XIE Yingbin, LU Ming. Application of cranioplasty with three-dimensional plastic titanium mesh in the repair of skull defects[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(1): 35-37. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200671
Citation: SHAO Xianmao, WU Liangfa, WANG Jingfa, MAO Xiaoman, XIE Yingbin, LU Ming. Application of cranioplasty with three-dimensional plastic titanium mesh in the repair of skull defects[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(1): 35-37. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20200671

Application of cranioplasty with three-dimensional plastic titanium mesh in the repair of skull defects

More Information
  • Received Date: November 10, 2020
  • Available Online: January 17, 2021
  • Published Date: January 14, 2021
  •   Objective  To study the effect of cranioplasty with three-dimensional plastic titanium mesh in the repair of skull defects.
      Methods  A total of 45 patients with frontotemporal skull defects were randomly divided into observation group (n=29) and control group (n=16). The observation group was treated with three-dimensional plastic titanium mesh for cranioplasty, while the control group was treated with two-dimensional titanium mesh artificial shaping for skull repair. Beauty satisfaction related indicators in the two groups were compared.
      Results  At three months of follow-up after surgical treatment, there were 29 cases of symmetrical cephalic patterns on the cranial repair side and the undamaged side as well as 1 case of temporalis muscle collapse in the observation group. There were 12 cases of symmetrical cephalic patterns on the cranial repair side and the undamaged side, 4 cases of temporalis muscle collapse, 6 cases of scalp infection, 5 cases of line junction exposure, 3 cases of titanium mesh upturned or exposed, and 3 cases of subcutaneous hydrops in the control group. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of beauty satisfaction and the number of patients with common complications (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  The incidence of common complications of cranioplasty with three-dimensional plastic titanium mesh is low, and the aesthetic satisfaction of the patients is high.
  • [1]
    YAMAURA A, MAKINO H. Neurological deficits in the presence of the sinking skin flap following decompressive craniectomy[J]. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo), 1977, 17(Pt 1): 43-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/74031
    [2]
    KASPRZAK P, ORMEZOWSKA E, JASKLSKI D. Cranioplasty as the return-to-work factor-112 patients with cranial defects treated in the Department of Neurosurgery at the Medical University of Lodz[J]. Int J Occup Med Environ Health, 2017, 30(5): 803-809. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28584308
    [3]
    ZANATY M, CHALOUHI N, STARKE R M, et al. Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases[J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 123(1): 182-188. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.JNS14405
    [4]
    吴杉英, 黄祖根, 薛华栋, 等. VSD联合组织瓣修复颅骨修补术后钛网外露[J]. 福建医科大学学报, 2019, 53(3): 201-202. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYD201903017.htm
    [5]
    中华神经外科学会神经创伤专业组, 中华创伤学会神经损伤专业组, 中国神经外科医师协会神经创伤专家委员会. 创伤性颅骨缺损成形术中国专家共识[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2016, 32(8): 767-770. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2016.08.002
    [6]
    LINDNER D, SCHLOTHOFER-SCHUMANN K, KERN B C, et al. Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 126(1): 175-183. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.JNS151245
    [7]
    冯士军, 王志刚, 石瑞成. 皮下引流在预防颅骨修补术后并发症的效果分析[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2014, 30(6): 78-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BTYX201406033.htm
    [8]
    孙鸿, 游潮, 张跃康, 等. 颅骨成形术137例临床分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2006(10): 731-733. doi: 10.3760/j:issn:1001-8050.2006.10.004
    [9]
    刘文涛, 张根堂, 刘芳玲. 颅骨修补治疗线结排异反应23例[J]. 山东大学学报: 医学版, 2013, 51(12): 86-87, 91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYB201312022.htm
    [10]
    周明强, 李红. 外科切口皮肤缝线排异反应的临床分析[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2010, 26(3): 424-425. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYWS201003079.htm
    [11]
    蔡明, 王志明, 冯斌, 等. 可吸收线结合皮肤吻合器在颅骨修补术头皮切口缝合中的应用[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(18): 2603-2605. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2018.18.027
    [12]
    于永太, 王建军, 孙炜. 颅骨修补术后脑血流动力学变化与临床表现的相关性研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(7): 797-800. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKLS201907012.htm
    [13]
    续岭, 肖顺武, 张学军, 等. 重型颅脑外伤去大骨瓣减压后颅骨修补时机的临床研究[J]. 遵义医学院学报, 2018, 41(2): 184-188. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2715.2018.02.013

Catalog

    Article views (331) PDF downloads (11) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return