Analysis of 54 patients with gynecological benign lesions treated by transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery

HE Suli; LIU Haiyan; XIA Yan; DING Yan

doi:10.7619/jcmp.201916026

Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice > 2019 > 23(16): 97-100. > DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916026

HE Suli, LIU Haiyan, XIA Yan, DING Yan. Analysis of 54 patients with gynecological benign lesions treated by transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(16): 97-100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916026

Citation:

PDF (599 KB)

Analysis of 54 patients with gynecological benign lesions treated by transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225000

More Information

Received Date: May 16, 2019
Accepted Date: June 27, 2019
Available Online: February 28, 2021
Published Date: August 27, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of benign gynecological lesions.
Methods The clinical data of 54 cases with benign gynecological benign lesions treated with transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic surgery from April to October 2018, and 46 cases with benign gynecological benign lesions in the same period treated by porous laparoscopic surgery were analyzed.
Results Fifty-four patients underwent transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgeries successfully. There was no patient transferring to porous laparoscopic or open surgeries. The average operation time of unilateral salpingectomy was (32.31±13.48) min, the average operation time of removal of ovarian cysts was (47.62±15.86) min, the average operation time of uterine leiomyoma was (65.45±16.80) min, the average operation time of total hysterectomy was (94.00±15.17) min, the average operation time of unilateral attachment removal was (55.00±27.39) min. The operative time above in the transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery group showed no significant differences compared to the porous laparoscopic surgery group(P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the amount of bleeding, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative complications, total hospitalization costs(P>0.05). Postoperative satisfaction towards wound pain and appearance showed statistically significant differences.
Conclusion Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery is feasible and is as safe as porous laparoscopic surgery. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopy is a better choice for young women with aesthetic requirements.
- single-port laparoscopy,
- porous laparoscopic surgery,
- feasibility,
- safety

FullText(HTML)

References (16)

References

[1]	姜海军, 宫轲. 单孔腹腔镜手术进展与未来[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2010, 10(1): 37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2010.01.016
[2]	Lee Y Y, Kim T J, Kim C J, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 151(2): 181-184. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.010
[3]	Musquera M, Peri L, Izquierdo L, et al. Is LESS/NOTES surgery the new gold standard of minimally invasive surgery?[J]. Arch Esp Urol, 2013, 66(1): 161-167. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23406812
[4]	肖术芹, 王春阳, 韩璐, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜在子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用研究[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2018, 40(4): 340-343. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLYK201804012.htm
[5]	黄晖媛, 赵仁峰. 经脐单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术的安全性研究[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志: 电子版, 2018, 11(1): 32-34. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2018.01.009
[6]	Gunderson C C, Knight J, Ybanez-Morano J, et al. The risk of umbilical hernia and other complications with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2012, 19(1): 40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.09.002
[7]	纪妹, 苏玥辉, 赵瞾, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科附件手术中应用的对比研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2012, 12(7): 631-634. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2012.07.017
[8]	Canes D, Desai M M, Aron M, et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status[J]. Eur Urol, 2008, 54(5): 1020-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.009
[9]	刘秀, 温蒙科, 刘海元, 等. 单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术的临床对照研究[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017, 52(10): 675-678. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2017.10.006
[10]	谭宏伟, 李小娟, 胡春艳, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管妊娠的对比研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2015, 15(7): 610-612, 615. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2015.07.009
[11]	张俊吉, 孙大为, 熊巍. 单孔腹腔镜子宫全切除术23例临床分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(4): 287-289. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2014.04.010
[12]	马秀清, 苗庆松. 经脐单孔腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2011, 16(5): 337-338. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6612.2011.05.007
[13]	叶焕巧, 秦炜, 贺菁蓉, 等. 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科良性附件疾病中的应用[J]. 深圳中西医结合杂志, 2016, 26(13): 72-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZZX201613034.htm
[14]	余杰海, 陈林, 童冲杰. 传统气腹和无气腹经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科手术的应用[J]. 妇科与遗传: 电子版, 2018, 8(2): 23-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FCYC201802005.htm
[15]	魏伟. 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗良性卵巢肿瘤的疗效观察[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(5): 68-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2018.05.012
[16]	高鑫, 胡志洪. 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗妇科良性肿瘤及辅助生殖技术[J]. 吉林医学, 2018, 39(11): 2120-2121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0412.2018.11.053

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(17)

1.	杨志国. 微创拔牙术治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的有效性及作用研究. 罕少疾病杂志. 2025(03): 40-42 .
2.	金苏菊，李雪晶，刘凤林，朱晓洁. 规范化循证护理干预联合四手操作配合在下颌水平低位阻生智齿拔除术中的应用. 齐鲁护理杂志. 2024(06): 152-154 .
3.	周芳，曾文玲. 循证护理联合规范化疼痛护理在低位阻生智齿拔除中的应用效果. 医疗装备. 2024(06): 123-125 .
4.	吴康，王国栋. 微创拔牙术拔除下颌低位阻生智齿对疼痛程度的影响. 中国卫生标准管理. 2024(09): 123-127 .
5.	方首镕，王晓云，雷雨露，宁润来，蒋宁宁. 下颌低位阻生智齿拔除应用CBCT介导超声骨刀的效果及对PTX3、MPO、PGE2的影响. 中国医学工程. 2023(02): 59-63 .
6.	潘其达. 不翻瓣法配合涡轮机拔除下颌阻生智齿的应用效果及预后观察. 现代诊断与治疗. 2023(03): 428-430 .
7.	王鑫，侍泉华. 浓缩生长因子在下颌阻生齿拔除术中的应用效果及对患者生活质量的影响. 中国美容医学. 2023(05): 142-145 .
8.	王军，刘素芳，王会敏. 微创拔牙术治疗下颌复杂阻生牙的临床疗效. 深圳中西医结合杂志. 2023(08): 115-118 .
9.	许慧英. 微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除治疗中的应用及对患者拔牙后张口受限程度以及并发症情况的影响. 系统医学. 2023(08): 169-173 .
10.	徐金伟，张琴，陈海苏，于保军，俞辉明. 高速涡轮钻联合超声骨刀对下颌低位阻生智齿拔除的效果. 中国医药导报. 2023(21): 129-132 .
11.	杨剑. 微创拔牙器械配合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法在下颌低位阻生智齿治疗中的效果评价. 中国医药科学. 2023(13): 195-198 .
12.	邹雅琴，凌瑞，劳茉，王敬雯，栗璞. 微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用价值. 实用临床医学. 2023(03): 74-77 .
13.	张莉，闫召民，姚燕，王宇. 高速涡轮机联合微创拔牙刀在下颌阻生智齿中的应用及对疼痛程度、并发症的影响分析. 黑龙江医学. 2023(19): 2313-2315 .
14.	王笑梅. 高速涡轮牙钻联合微创拔牙刀在阻生智齿拔除术中的应用效果. 医学信息. 2023(21): 118-121 .
15.	沈博文. 微创拔牙与传统器械拔牙治疗下颌阻生智齿的疗效对比分析. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2022(03): 7-9 .
16.	孙辉，陈志方，王晓东. 下颌水平低位阻生齿拔除术治疗下颌阻生第三磨牙对患者牙周健康状况的影响. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版). 2022(04): 74-77 .
17.	杜文斌，曹玮奇，姚国华，张帅，李尔涛，任辉. 十字形分牙法在下颌水平低位阻生齿拔除中的临床效果分析. 中国美容医学. 2021(12): 105-108 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (196) PDF downloads (4) Cited by(17)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Analysis of 54 patients with gynecological benign lesions treated by transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(17)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content