Advance Search
WANG Junmei, DU Lan. Laparoscopic myomectomy versus hysteroscopic electrotomy of myoma for hysteromyoma complicated with infertility[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(15): 56-59. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201915015
Citation: WANG Junmei, DU Lan. Laparoscopic myomectomy versus hysteroscopic electrotomy of myoma for hysteromyoma complicated with infertility[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(15): 56-59. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201915015
shu

Laparoscopic myomectomy versus hysteroscopic electrotomy of myoma for hysteromyoma complicated with infertility

  • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xi′an Angel Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xi′an, Shaanxi, 710032

More Information
  • Received Date: April 12, 2019
  • Revised Date: June 09, 2019
  • Available Online: February 23, 2021
  • Published Date: August 14, 2019
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To compare the efficiency between laparoscopic myomectomy and hysteroscopic electrotomy of myoma in treatment of hysteromyoma complicated with infertility.
      Methods  Eighty-eight hysteromyoma patients with infertility were selected and divided into control group (treated by laparoscopic myomectomy) and study group (treated by hysteroscopic electrotomy of myoma), with 44 cases in each group. The therapeutic effect was compared between two groups.
      Results  The operation time, anal exhaust time and intra-operative bleeding volume of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). At 6 months after operation, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2) in both groups recovered to the preoperative level, and there was no significant difference (P>0.05). After 12 months of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the recurrence rate and pregnancy rate between two groups (P>0.05). The time to first pregnancy after operation in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  In the treatment of hysteromyoma complicated with infertility, both laparoscopic myomectomy and hysteroscopic electrotomy of myoma have less impact on ovarian reserve function, which can improve pregnancy rate and control recurrence. Compared with laparoscopic myomectomy, hysteroscopic electrotomy of myoma can better control surgical trauma, reduce intra-operative bleeding and shorten the time to first pregnancy after operation.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (18)
  • [1]
    牛建新, 唐俊婷, 刘宁. 子宫肌瘤临床病理特征及预后影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(16): 184-187. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201816058.htm
    [2]
    杨海燕, 黄晓武. 子宫肌瘤与女性生育[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2017, 36(3): 219-225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1889.2017.03.009
    [3]
    管付娟. 手术方式对子宫肌瘤患者机体的创伤影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2017, 46(23): 2912-2913. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2017.23.030
    [4]
    陈欣. 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与经腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床效果比较[J]. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(14): 88-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYCY201714023.htm
    [5]
    吕航航, 王博蔚, 李毡. 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤手术中应用电动粉碎器引起的相关并发症及其对临床实践的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(10): 239-242. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB201810073.htm
    [6]
    彭广侠. 宫腔镜电切术治疗黏膜下子宫肌瘤40例的临床疗效及预后分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2017, 21(13): 148-149. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201713047
    [7]
    子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识专家组. 子宫肌瘤的诊治中国专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017, 52(12): 793-800. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2017.12.001
    [8]
    谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 36-38.
    [9]
    徐珲, 杜秀娟. 子宫肌瘤剔除术对不孕女性妊娠的影响及影响术后妊娠的相关因素分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2018, 27(9): 48-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2018.09.015
    [10]
    崔冠濠. 子宫肌瘤与不孕症的新概念及最新药物治疗[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2017, 25(7): 436-437. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY201707001.htm
    [11]
    赵一, 冯力民, 张君妍. 宫内病变与妊娠的关系[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2017, 33(4): 12-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFCZ201704005.htm
    [12]
    戴凯玲, 李瑞岐, 方庭枫, 等. 不影响宫腔形态的肌壁间子宫肌瘤对体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠结局的影响[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(15): 2308-2311. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2017.15.014
    [13]
    王玲, 胡亮, 刘畅, 等. 267例无生育史的子宫肌瘤患者经高强度聚焦超声消融治疗术后妊娠结局分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018, 40(20): 57-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DSDX201820010.htm
    [14]
    熊域霖, 吕发金. 多模态磁共振成像在子宫肌瘤中的研究进展[J]. 磁共振成像, 2018, 9(9): 716-720. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGZC201809018.htm
    [15]
    崔楠, 张景宏. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术对子宫肌瘤患者术后胃肠功能恢复及血清IFN-γ、AngⅡ水平变化的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(24): 4130-4133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.24.027
    [16]
    刘娟弟, 邓晓红, 何菊仙, 等. 腹腔镜与宫腔镜子宫肌瘤电切术对子宫壁间肌瘤患者卵巢功能、妊娠情况的影响[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2017, 34(11): 1597-1600. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXYD201711016.htm
    [17]
    汪琛瑜, 史小菲. 宫腔镜下电切术联合药物控释性节育环治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效观察[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2017, 16(4): 394-396. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2017.04.026
    [18]
    刘聃, 那飞. 宫腔镜子宫肌瘤电切术治疗子宫肌瘤疗效分析[J]. 四川医学, 2018, 39(4): 453-457. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCYX201804027.htm
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]LIN Ying. Effect of suture hemostasis and traditional electrocoagulation hemostasis on ovarian function and pregnancy rate of patients with laparoscopic removal of benign ovarian tumors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(20): 68-71. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202020019
    [2]LI Yurong, DUAN Yuanli. Effect of laparoscopic surgery in patients with ectopic pregnancy and its impact on re-ectopic pregnancy rate[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(9): 111-113. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202009032
    [3]YUAN Jinhua, YANG Liying. Effect of simultaneous application of cesarean section and myomectomy for pregnant women with hysteromyoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(14): 99-102. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201914027
    [4]ZHU Yan, WU Xiaoyi. Nursing of transumbilical single hole laparoscopy in benign lesion surgery in gynecological department[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (12): 102-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201812030
    [5]ZHANG Feifeng, XIA Ping, LIN Hong. Clinical observation of transvaginal lesions excision in lower uterine segment scar pregnancy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (5): 116-118. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201805036
    [6]Minawaer·Aizezi, Guzailinuer·Maimaitituersun, Hanikezi·Tuerxun. Effects of letrozole combined with high-purity menotrophin on the pregnancy and reproductive hormones changes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (13): 76-79. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201713020
    [7]MA Chun, TIAN Li. Influence of uterine perfusion with hCG in ovulatory period on endometrial pinopodes and clinical pregnancy rate in patients with RSA[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (21): 69-71,75. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201621021
    [8]CHEN Aizhong, WU Qunying. The impact of QCC in reducing catheter prolapse rate for infertility patients with laparoscopic pelvic adhesions decomposition under general anesthesia during recovery period[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (12): 105-107. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201612033
    [9]HUANG Liyun, RAO Hongchao, LUO Meilian. The influence of nursing intervention on obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome combined with infertility[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (8): 61-62,72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201408020
    [10]JI Weipeng, JIN Yang. Clinical observation of 60 patients with myomectomy during the cesarean section[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (17): 72-74. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201317024

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(17)

    1. 杨志国. 微创拔牙术治疗下颌低位阻生智齿的有效性及作用研究. 罕少疾病杂志. 2025(03): 40-42 .
    2. 金苏菊，李雪晶，刘凤林，朱晓洁. 规范化循证护理干预联合四手操作配合在下颌水平低位阻生智齿拔除术中的应用. 齐鲁护理杂志. 2024(06): 152-154 .
    3. 周芳，曾文玲. 循证护理联合规范化疼痛护理在低位阻生智齿拔除中的应用效果. 医疗装备. 2024(06): 123-125 .
    4. 吴康，王国栋. 微创拔牙术拔除下颌低位阻生智齿对疼痛程度的影响. 中国卫生标准管理. 2024(09): 123-127 .
    5. 方首镕，王晓云，雷雨露，宁润来，蒋宁宁. 下颌低位阻生智齿拔除应用CBCT介导超声骨刀的效果及对PTX3、MPO、PGE2的影响. 中国医学工程. 2023(02): 59-63 .
    6. 潘其达. 不翻瓣法配合涡轮机拔除下颌阻生智齿的应用效果及预后观察. 现代诊断与治疗. 2023(03): 428-430 .
    7. 王鑫，侍泉华. 浓缩生长因子在下颌阻生齿拔除术中的应用效果及对患者生活质量的影响. 中国美容医学. 2023(05): 142-145 .
    8. 王军，刘素芳，王会敏. 微创拔牙术治疗下颌复杂阻生牙的临床疗效. 深圳中西医结合杂志. 2023(08): 115-118 .
    9. 许慧英. 微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除治疗中的应用及对患者拔牙后张口受限程度以及并发症情况的影响. 系统医学. 2023(08): 169-173 .
    10. 徐金伟，张琴，陈海苏，于保军，俞辉明. 高速涡轮钻联合超声骨刀对下颌低位阻生智齿拔除的效果. 中国医药导报. 2023(21): 129-132 .
    11. 杨剑. 微创拔牙器械配合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法在下颌低位阻生智齿治疗中的效果评价. 中国医药科学. 2023(13): 195-198 .
    12. 邹雅琴，凌瑞，劳茉，王敬雯，栗璞. 微创拔牙术在下颌阻生智齿拔除中的应用价值. 实用临床医学. 2023(03): 74-77 .
    13. 张莉，闫召民，姚燕，王宇. 高速涡轮机联合微创拔牙刀在下颌阻生智齿中的应用及对疼痛程度、并发症的影响分析. 黑龙江医学. 2023(19): 2313-2315 .
    14. 王笑梅. 高速涡轮牙钻联合微创拔牙刀在阻生智齿拔除术中的应用效果. 医学信息. 2023(21): 118-121 .
    15. 沈博文. 微创拔牙与传统器械拔牙治疗下颌阻生智齿的疗效对比分析. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2022(03): 7-9 .
    16. 孙辉，陈志方，王晓东. 下颌水平低位阻生齿拔除术治疗下颌阻生第三磨牙对患者牙周健康状况的影响. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版). 2022(04): 74-77 .
    17. 杜文斌，曹玮奇，姚国华，张帅，李尔涛，任辉. 十字形分牙法在下颌水平低位阻生齿拔除中的临床效果分析. 中国美容医学. 2021(12): 105-108 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (304) PDF downloads (5) Cited by(17)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return