左西孟旦在心脏瓣膜病相关肺动脉高压患者心脏瓣膜置换术围术期应用的安全性及有效性

Safety and efficacy of levosimendan in perioperative period for patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with valvular heart disease undergoing heart valve replacement surgery

  • 摘要:
    目的 观察左西孟旦在心脏瓣膜病相关肺动脉高压患者心脏瓣膜置换术围术期应用的安全性及有效性。
    方法 选取2023年4月—2024年5月接受心脏瓣膜置换术的心脏瓣膜病相关肺动脉高压患者90例为研究对象。根据左西孟旦使用情况,将患者分为低剂量组、高剂量组和对照组,每组30例。对照组给予常规药物治疗; 低剂量组于术前3 d至术后3 d使用左西孟旦1支联合常规药物治疗; 高剂量组于术前3 d至术后3 d使用左西孟旦2支联合常规药物治疗。收集并记录患者入院时和出院前脑钠肽(BNP)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)、肌酐(Cr)、平均肺动脉压(mPAP)、左心疾病相关性肺动脉高压(PH-LHD)状况、术后ICU滞留时间、术后住院时间及心功能分级情况。
    结果 对照组、低剂量组和高剂量组患者性别、年龄、体质量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组Cr升高值组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组与高剂量组、对照组与低剂量组术后ICU滞留时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.017、0.028)。低剂量组与高剂量组术后ICU滞留时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.839)。对照组与高剂量组、对照组与低剂量组术后住院时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001、0.009), 但低剂量组与高剂量组差异无统计学意义(P=0.463)。3组均未出现严重并发症,中途无研究对象退出。仅高剂量组1例患者术后使用左西孟旦过程中出现低血压,在补充液体容量后血压恢复正常。3组mPAP下降值组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组与高剂量组BNP下降值比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.025); 对照组与低剂量组、低剂量组与高剂量组BNP下降值比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.068、0.970)。对照组与高剂量组LVEF升高值比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.019); 对照组与低剂量组、低剂量组与高剂量组LVEF升高值比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.055、0.652)。对照组与低剂量组、对照组与高剂量组LVEDD缩小值比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.019、0.033); 但低剂量组与高剂量组差异无统计学意义(P=0.829)。对照组临床治疗有效18例(60.0%), 低剂量组22例(73.3%), 高剂量组24例(80.0%)。3组临床疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.220)。
    结论 左西孟旦在心脏瓣膜病相关肺动脉高压患者围术期的应用安全、有效,且高剂量使用能更显著地提高LVEF和降低BNP水平。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To observe the safety and efficacy of levosimendan in the perioperative period for patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with valvular heart disease undergoing heart valve replacement surgery.
    Methods A total of 90 patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with valvular heart disease who underwent valve replacement surgery from April 2023 to May 2024 were enrolled. Based on the use of levosimendan, patients were divided into low-dose group, high-dose group, and control group, with 30 patients in each group. The control group received conventional drug therapy; the low-dose group received one dose of levosimendan from 3 days before surgery to 3 days after surgery combined with conventional drug therapy; the high-dose group received two doses of levosimendan from 3 days before surgery to 3 days after surgery combined with conventional drug therapy. Data on brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), creatinine (Cr), mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), PH related to left heart disease (PH-LHD) status, postoperative ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay, and cardiac function classification were collected and recorded at admission and before discharge.
    Results There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and body mass among the control group, low-dose group, and high-dose group (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the increase in Cr among the three groups (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in postoperative ICU stay between the control group and the high-dose group, and between the control group and the low-dose group (P=0.017, 0.028). However, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative ICU stay between the low-dose group and the high-dose group (P=0.839). There were statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stay between the control group and the high-dose group, and between the control group and the low-dose group (P=0.001, 0.009), but no statistically significant difference was found between the low-dose group and the high-dose group (P=0.463). No serious complications occurred in any of three groups, and no patients withdrew from the study. Only one patient in the high-dose group experienced hypotension during the postoperative use of levosimendan, which normalized after fluid replacement. There was no statistically significant difference in the decrease in mPAP among the three groups (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the decrease in BNP between the control group and the high-dose group (P=0.025); however, there were no statistically significant differences in the decrease in BNP between the control group and the low-dose group, or between the low-dose group and the high-dose group (P=0.068, 0.970). There was a statistically significant difference in the increase in LVEF between the control group and the high-dose group (P=0.019); however, there were no statistically significant differences in the increase in LVEF between the control group and the low-dose group, or between the low-dose group and the high-dose group (P=0.055, 0.652). There were statistically significant differences in the decrease in LVEDD between the control group and the low-dose group, and between the control group and the high-dose group (P=0.019, 0.033); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the low-dose group and the high-dose group (P=0.829). In the control group, 18 patients (60.0%) had clinically effective treatment, 22 patients (73.3%) in the low-dose group, and 24 patients (80.0%) in the high-dose group. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical efficacy among the three groups (P=0.220).
    Conclusion Levosimendan is safe and effective in the perioperative period for patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with valvular heart disease, and high-dose use can more significantly improve LVEF and reduce BNP levels.

     

/

返回文章
返回