血浆G蛋白偶联受体15配体在系统性红斑狼疮中的表达及临床应用价值

Expression and clinical value of G-protein coupled receptor 15 ligand in systemic lupus erythematosus

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨G蛋白偶联受体15配体(GPR15L)在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者中的表达水平及临床应用价值。
    方法 在回顾性队列中采用实时荧光定量逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)检测63例SLE患者(SLE组)和57例健康对照者(对照组)外周血G蛋白偶联受体15(GPR15) mRNA、GPR15L mRNA表达水平; 采用酶联免疫吸附法检测SLE组、对照组、50例类风湿关节炎(RA)患者(疾病对照组)血清GPR15L蛋白表达水平; 分析血清GPR15L与SLE患者实验室指标、疗效的关系。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析血清GPR15单独以及联合常见自身抗体指标诊断SLE的效能。采用多因素Logistic回归分析探讨SLE发病的独立危险因素。
    结果 与对照组比较, SLE组外周血GPR15 mRNA、GPR15L mRNA水平升高, 差异有统计学意义(P=0.016 4、P < 0.000 1); SLE组血清GPR15L表达高于疾病对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.000 1)。SLE患者血清GPR15L蛋白表达水平与GPR15L mRNA以及疾病活动度均呈正相关(r=0.301 3, P=0.016 4; r=0.361 7, P=0.003 6), 与补体C3、C4水平呈负相关(r=-0.341 2, P=0.006 2; r=-0.338 4, P=0.006 7)。ROC曲线显示, 血清GPR15L鉴别SLE组与对照组的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.870 8, 鉴别SLE组与疾病对照组的AUC为0.765 5; 血清GPR15L联合anti-SSA诊断SLE的效能显著提高, AUC为0.895 2。多因素Logistic回归分析显示, GPR15L蛋白以及GPR15L mRNA升高是SLE发病的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。
    结论 SLE患者血清GPR15L蛋白水平显著升高与SLE疾病活动度密切相关, GPR15L异常表达可能在SLE的发病机制中发挥重要作用。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the expression level and clinical application value of G-protein coupled receptor 15 ligand (GPR15L) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
    Methods In a retrospective cohort, real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to detect the expression levels of G-protein coupled receptor 15 (GPR15) mRNA and GPR15L mRNA in peripheral blood from 63 SLE patients (SLE group) and 57 healthy controls (control group). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was employed to measure the serum GPR15L protein expression levels in the SLE group, control group, and 50 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (disease control group). The relationship between serum GPR15L and laboratory indicators as well as therapeutic efficacy in SLE patients was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic efficacy of serum GPR15 alone and combination with common autoantibody indicators for SLE. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the independent risk factors for SLE onset.
    Results Compared with the control group, the SLE group exhibited increased levels of GPR15 mRNA and GPR15L mRNA in peripheral blood (P=0.016 4, P < 0.000 1, respectively). The serum GPR15L expression in the SLE group was higher than that in the disease control group (P < 0.000 1). The serum GPR15L protein expression level in SLE patients was positively correlated with GPR15L mRNA and disease activity (r=0.301 3, P=0.016 4; r=0.361 7, P=0.003 6) and negatively correlated with complement C3 and C4 levels (r=-0.341 2, P=0.006 2; r=-0.338 4, P=0.006 7). The ROC curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for serum GPR15L in distinguishing the SLE group from the control group was 0.870 8, and the AUC for distinguishing the SLE group from the control group was 0.765 5. The diagnostic efficacy of serum GPR15L combined with anti-SSA for SLE was significantly improved, with an AUC of 0.895 2. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that elevated GPR15L protein and GPR15L mRNA were independent risk factors for SLE onset (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion The significant increase in serum GPR15L protein levels in SLE patients is closely related to SLE disease activity, and abnormal expression of GPR15L may play an important role in the pathogenesis of SLE.

     

/

返回文章
返回