全内镜下椎板开窗术与椎间孔入路椎管减压术在退行性腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症治疗中的应用效果比较

Application effects of endoscopic laminar fenestration versus percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression in the treatment of degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较全内镜下椎板开窗术(Endo-LOVE)与椎间孔入路椎管减压术(PETD)对退行性腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症(LSLRS)患者的近期疗效及并发症发生情况。
    方法 选取160例LSLRS患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(接受PETD治疗)和观察组(接受Endo-LOVE治疗),每组80例。观察2组患者的手术相关指标、并发症发生情况和疗效;比较2组患者手术前后的骨性侧隐窝角、软性侧隐窝角、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、疼痛评分、日本骨科协会腰痛疾病评定表(JOA)评分。
    结果 观察组术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);2组下肢麻木、发热、术后腰背痛等并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前, 2组骨性侧隐窝角、软性侧隐窝角比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后72 h,2组骨性侧隐窝角、软性侧隐窝角均较术前增大,且观察组大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。术前, 2组疼痛评分、ODI评分和JOA评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3个月时,2组JOA评分均较术前升高,疼痛评分、ODI评分均较术前降低,且观察组JOA评分高于对照组,疼痛评分、ODI评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组优良率为96.25%(77/80), 高于对照组的87.50%(70/80), 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。
    结论 相较于PETD方案, Endo-LOVE方案治疗LSLRS具有手术时间短、术中出血量少、近期疗效好的优点。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and occurrence of complication of endoscopic laminar fenestration (Endo-LOVE) and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression (PETD) in patients with degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis (LSLRS).
    Methods A total of 160 patients with LSLRS were enrolled as study objects, and were randomly assigned to control group (treated with PETD) and observation group (treated with Endo-LOVE), with 80 patients in each group. Surgical indicators, occurrence of complications, and therapeutic effects were observed and compared between the two groups. Bone lateral recess angle, soft lateral recess angle, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, pain score, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were compared before and after surgery.
    Results The observation group had less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter operative and hospital stays than the control group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications such as lower limb numbness, fever, and postoperative low back pain between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative bone lateral recess angle or soft lateral recess angle between the two groups (P>0.05). At 72 hours postoperatively, both angles increased in both groups compared with preoperative values, and the observation group had larger angles than the control group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative pain score, ODI score, or JOA score between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, JOA scores increased and pain scores as well as ODI scores decreased in both groups compared with preoperative values, with the observation group having higher JOA scores and lower pain scores as well as ODI scores than the control group (P < 0.05). The excellent and good rate was 96.25%(77/80) in the observation group, which was higher than 87.50%(70/80) in the control group (P < 0.05).
    Conclusion Compared with the PETD approach, the Endo-LOVE approach for the treatment of LSLRS offers shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and better short-term efficacy.

     

/

返回文章
返回