Wiltse入路与微创经皮入路治疗无神经症状的胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较

蒋正文

蒋正文. Wiltse入路与微创经皮入路治疗无神经症状的胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, (5): 71-73,77. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201505022
引用本文: 蒋正文. Wiltse入路与微创经皮入路治疗无神经症状的胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, (5): 71-73,77. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201505022
JIANG Zhengwen. Effect comparison between Wiltse approach and minimally invasive percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture patients without neurological deficit[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (5): 71-73,77. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201505022
Citation: JIANG Zhengwen. Effect comparison between Wiltse approach and minimally invasive percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture patients without neurological deficit[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (5): 71-73,77. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201505022

Wiltse入路与微创经皮入路治疗无神经症状的胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: R683

Effect comparison between Wiltse approach and minimally invasive percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture patients without neurological deficit

  • 摘要: 目的 比较Wiltse入路与微创经皮入路在无神经症状的胸腰椎骨折患者中的应用效果.方法 74例无神经症状胸腰椎骨折患者随机分为Wiltse组(n=37)与经皮微创组(n=37),分别给予Wiltse入路与微创经皮入路,比较2组患者临床效果.结果 Wiltse组手术费用显著低于经皮微创组(P<0.01);2组术后VAS评分及ODI均显著降低(P<0.01);2组患者术后椎体高度比均显著高于术前(P<0.01),矢状位Cobb角以及受伤椎体楔形变角均显著小于术前(P<0.01).结论 Wiltse入路与微创经皮入路手术对无症状性胸腰椎骨折的治疗效果相当,但Wiltse入路手术费用相对较低.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  156
  • HTML全文浏览量:  23
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回